Police Department ( Jpd ) - 993 Words

Jeffersontown Police Department (JPD) is a police agency that is committed to community policing and working with the community to ensure safety and peace for all citizen. The JPD jurisdiction is much smaller than the well-known Louisville Metro Police Department (LMPD) and functions with fewer officers on the streets. Similar to LMPD they have the ability to enforce both local metropolitan laws and state laws. If JPD did not exist there would still be law enforcement in the area, LMPD, but the sense of community policing would decrease dramatically. Along with losing community policing officers would likely be stretched thin and unable to do proactive policing causing crime rates to increase. JPD is responsible for a variety of services†¦show more content†¦These experiences along with training with the special operations group (SOG) was a talking point during my last interview. Although my new job will not require any of this training if I decide the office life is not for me it will prove valuable. Not only in the workforce is this training valuable, but the pistol training I will continue to use at the range in my free time. My second goal of working with specialty units had mixed outcomes. Working with the K-9 unit proved difficult because they were in the process of retiring one K-9 and training a new one. Kimo in the process of being training got kennel cough and was sidelined for a while, but I was able to see the technology of future K-9 work. Officer Wescott has been working on a better way to lift K-9’s into attics with a claw-like pulley system. I learned that K-9 unit although sounds like fun to every animal loving person is not what it is all cracked up to be. Caring for a patrol K-9 can be demanding, training consistently, and you are likely to change partners a few time, but you will always have a partner. I was able to work with detectives one night after a stolen car was recovered along with a juvenile and young adult. The biggest part of this experience was that once you take somebody into an interrogation room they sing like a cannery. The interrogation was over just as fast as it started. I was able to attend two trainings with the special operations group (SOG).

Judith Lewis Hermans Trauma and Recovery - 1061 Words

Judith Lewis Herman’s Trauma and Recovery provides not only greater understanding of how a traumatic event may defined but also the ways in which the effects of the experience may have a significantly repressing effect on the present and future self. Traumatic events are impressing on the self because they overwhelm the conventional emotional and physical perceptions that humanity has adjusted and modified their selves to. As traumatic events generally involve threats to the emotional and physical self, they differ from common misfortunes as they confront the victim with the feeling of extreme terror and helplessness that in result causes the individual to perceive the experience as one that was out of their control. As Herman reiterates, according to the Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, â€Å"The common denominator of psychological trauma is a feeling of â€Å"intense fear, helplessness, loss of control, and threat of annihilation† (Herman 104). However, it is th e response to the traumatic event in the emotional or conscious self that may differ from one another as there are three differing reactions to the terror factor of trauma: hyper-arousal, intrusion, and disconnection. Throughout this essay the work of Judith Lewis Herman’s Trauma and Recovery as well as Stephen Chbosky’s The Perks of Being a Wallflower will be utilized to illustrated the compromising effects a traumatic experience such as childhood sexual abuse may have on the development of a young teen and the ways in

Research Project Assignment free essay sample

Interview team members to clarify and provide insight into conversations. I will attempt to conduct these interviews shortly after conversations of interest. While the interviews will not be formal or structured, the kinds of questions I will ask include the following. The general strategy for the interviews is to start off with broad questions and follow up on the interviewee’s responses, to capture her or his meanings and to avoid imposing my meanings on the interviewee. 4. Undertake a situational analysis of the field notes and interview notes 5. Write a research report P3 Time line for the research: Prepare proposal by 1 April Complete literature review by 15 April Complete fieldwork by22 May Complete analysis by 29 May Give presentation on 3 June Complete final report by 16 June P4 Ethical Guidelines: Ethical guidelines were followed to ensure the confidentiality of the participants. The names of the businesses remained confidential and were not recorded with the responses. The research did not present any harm or risk to the participants, and each participant was informed of the goals and procedures of research through the distributed cover letter. The reporting method was explained on the last page of the questionnaire. The participants were given a telephone number to call if they had any additional questions about the project. P5 Primary and secondary research relating to the proposal: In my research work I will not use any secondary data or information and instead where I will use my findings out of my primary research. The purpose of this survey is to establish a better understanding of the local business opinions of the Community Events War Chest and to discover the degree of support or of opposition to this account. The Community Events War Chest account was first examined through board meetings, where members and representatives met to discuss the status of the account. They found that quantity and quality of information needed to correctly estimate local business interest in the Community Events War Chest could not be obtained through committee or member meetings. The purpose of this survey is to find the needed information to assess whether or not the account should be maintained. P6 Describe and justify the chosen methodology: The questionnaire used in this survey contains three interrelated sections. The first section is designed to identify the type of business and to gauge its involvement in Missoula community events. The second section focuses on the participant’s perception and knowledge of the Community Events War Chest. The third section assesses the willingness to donate to the Community Events War Chest. Open-ended questions are also posed to give the participants a chance to write down their own thoughts and suggestions for the types of events the businesses would like to see come to Missoula and the overall opinion of the Community Events War Chest. P7 Prepare for the research project process and action plan with supervisor: The businesses that responded to the survey consisted of 42. 9% restaurant, 35. 7% sporting goods/retail/grocery, 7. 1% hotel/motel, and 7. 1% other businesses. The participants were asked to rate their involvement in the community on a scale of one to four. Fourteen point three percent of the respondents claimed that they never attended events, and another 14. 3% said that they rarely attended events. There were, however, 50% of the respondents that indicated they occasionally attend events, and 21. % that say they attend events frequently. Participation in community events was also examined. We found that 21. 4% of the respondents never participated in community events, while 42. 9% of the population rarely participated in events. It was interesting to find that only 14. 3% of respondents occasionally participate in community events, and only 21. 4% claim that they frequently participate in community event s. The survey also indicated that respondent activity as volunteers for community events was comparable to the other sources of involvement. The category of volunteering includes things such as working at events, or planning events. Thirty-five point seven of the participants say they never volunteer, and 35. 7% say they rarely volunteer during events. The percent of respondents who occasionally volunteer is 28. 6% and no one responded that they frequently volunteer for community events. When asked how often they sponsored events, respondents indicated that 57. 1% frequently helped sponsor events. This sponsorship includes things such as finances and supplies donated to the event. This contrasts with the lack of involvement respondents indicated in the previous questions. Fourteen point three percent reported they did not ever sponsor events, 7. 1% rarely sponsored events, and 21. 4% occasionally sponsored events. The following table shows respondents’ answers to each of the four questions about community involvement. Never RarelyOccasionallyFrequently Attends Community Events14. 3%14. 3%50%21. 4% Participates in Sporting Events21. 4% 42. 9%14. 3%21. 4% Volunteers at Community Events35. 7% 35. 7%28. 6%0% Sponsors Community Events14. % 7. 1%21. 4%57. 1% P8 Monitor and revise schedule: This report includes four sections describing the process, findings, interpretation of results, and an appendix. The first section of this report focuses on the methods used in the survey. It includes the questionnaire design, methods, and ethical guidelines. The second section is devoted to the results and findings. This section provides a descriptive summary of the inform ation gathered from the surveys and the interpretations of the results according to the information provided by the local businesses. The third section discusses, explains, compares and interprets important results. This gives the Missoula Area Chamber of Commerce the needed information to better serve the needs of Missoula. The final section of the report is an appendix, where the reader is provided with verbatim copies of our cover letter, survey questionnaire, and other materials. P9 Collect and review data using appropriate methods: To obtain the data, a survey was mailed to a sample of ninety-six local businesses in and around the Missoula area. The participants were first mailed a cover letter and questionnaire. The cover letter explained the purpose of the survey and importance of prompt return. The cover letter also provided an explanation of procedures used to guarantee confidentiality and stated that the survey would only be used to assess the opinions of the participants and not to solicit funds. Instructions indicated that the survey could be faxed or mailed back to the Missoula Area Chamber of Commerce by the participants. A follow-up notice was sent in the form of a postcard one week after the initial mailing, reminding the participants of the importance of their involvement in the survey. P10 Analyze and interpret qualitative and quantitative data: The results also indicate that 35. 8% of the sample was familiar with the Community Events War Chest, and 57. 1% was not familiar. The remaining 7. 1% indicated that they were unsure about their familiarity. Twenty one point four percent of the sample reported that they would be willing to donated funding to the Community Events War Chest in the future, 35. 7% said that they were not interested in contributing to the fund, and 35. 7% said they might consider donating to the account if they had more information. The survey also asked the participants which donation method is preferred. From this section of questions, 41. 7% of respondents indicated that they were not considering donating to the Community Events War Chest, 25% of respondents said they were willing to donate after the effects of the events had been assessed by their business. The other categories of donation methods each had a 16. 7% response. P11 Record findings in an accepted format: CountPercent of Respondents Businesses Not Considering Donations541. 7 Preference of Donating a Percentage216. Preference of Donating a Lump Sum216. 7 Preference of Donating a Lump Sum216. 7 Preference of Donating after Effect325. 00 From the above table section of questions, 41. 7% of respondents indicated that they were not considering donating to the Community Events War Chest, 25% of respondents said they were willing to donate after the effects of the events had been assessed by their business. The other categories of donation methods each had a 16. 7% response. P12 Present and summaries the findings use suitable methods: The above pie chart shows percentage of the suggested event categories out of the participant, where I found 31% of the participant suggested only sports and Sports Arts, only Arts 15%, other 8% and not interested is 15%. P13Evaluate the methodology used and critically analyzes the findings: The open-ended questions gave the respondents a chance to respond to the questionnaire in their own words. The questions asked what sort of events the respondents would like to see brought to Missoula. Twenty eight point ix percent responded that they would like to see more sporting events and 14. 3% suggested art events, such as concerts and art shows, and 28. 6% indicated that they would like to see a combination of sporting events and art events. The remaining 7. 1% indicated other events, and 14. 3% said they were not interested in seeing events brought to the Missoula area. Overall, 50% of the respondents indicated a positive opinion of the Community Events War Chest. Twenty eight point six percent of the participants held a neutral opinion, and 14. % expressed a negative opinion about the Community Events War Chest. P14 Proposed recommendation based on findings: In order to achieve an accurate sample for the survey, the systematic sampling method was utilized. The sampling frame was chosen by determining which businesses were potentially affected by the Community Events War Chest. The following chart illustrates the number of respondents for each business category. This included the categories of restaurants, hotels, sporting goods, retail stores, bars, and taverns. From a sampling frame of 478 businesses, 96 were randomly chosen for our sample by taking every fifth business from my sampling frame. Conclusion: The results indicate that the local businesses generally support the Community Events War Chest. However, the response rate to the survey was low. After sending out 96 surveys to Missoula businesses and only receiving 14 in return, we could only conclude that either business was uninterested or that they were unaware of the implications of the Community Events War Chest. Other factors, such as the lack of a self addressed stamped envelope, or a lack of general information regarding the Community Events War Chest, may have also been responsible. Due to the low response rate, there can be no strong conclusion drawn from the results of the survey. However, these surveys may have increased the awareness of this fund in the local business community. Bibliography: †¢nces. ed. gov †¢Lecture notes †¢jnto. org